The High Court at Patna dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous because the Sessions Court had already concluded the trial in the underlying case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45122 of 2015 (8) dt.11-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45122 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2015 Thana -KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- KATIHAR
====================================================== 1. Harendra Uraon @ Harendra Kumar Uraon @ Harendra Uron @ Harendra Kumar Uron son of Late Gunja Urawn, resident of villageSardahi, P.S. Katihar Muffasil, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan (Spl.APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 8 11-05-2016 Seen the report submitted by the Sessions Judge, Katihar wherefrom it is evident that trial had already been concluded. That being so, the instant petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
Harendra Uraon @ Harendra Kumar Uraon @ Harendra Uron
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
