Allowed

Shambhu Tiwari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Oct 2016CR. MISC./42324/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a case alleging violence, assault, and property snatching over a land dispute. Petitioners were directed to present themselves within four weeks and could surrender on furnishing a bail bond and sureties under the said section to be released.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties within four weeks.

Shambhu Tiwari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42324 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2016 Thana -BHANGWANPUR HAT District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1. Shambhu Tiwari S/o Sri Nagendra Tiwari 2. Rajendra Tiwari S/o Late Janak Tiwari 3. Nagendra Tiwari S/o Late Vishambher Tiwari All are the resident of Village- Chorma, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, Distt- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 05-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶4

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Bhagwanpur Hat P. S. Case No. 87 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 341,323,324,354,379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

It is alleged in the First Information Report that accused persons, four in number entered into the house of the informant and while hurling abuses, they assaulted the informant’s daughter with lathi, danda and dagger . They are also said to have snatched a golden chain. It is evident from the First Information Report that land dispute is the reason behind the controversy.

¶6

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the allegations are vague and general in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the application.

¶8

application.
the

¶9

Considering the above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M, -X, Siwan in Bhagwanpur Hat P. S. Case No. 87 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶10

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶11

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶12

ArunKumar/-c U

Shambhu Tiwari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Tiwari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Azad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rabi Kant Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramkaliya Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shayam Babu @ Ram Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Malti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar