Allowed

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Oct 2016CR. MISC./42149/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner was to be released upon arrest or surrender by furnishing bail bonds subject to standard conditions including appearance before the police or court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed anticipatory bail; released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42149 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -TANDWA District- AURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar, S/o Arbind Singh, Resident of VillageSimri , P.S. Tandwa, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶4

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

It is alleged in the First Information Report that three accused persons including the petitioner entered into the informant’s foootwear shop, assaulted him and snatched a sum of Rs. 75,000/-.

¶6

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the informant runs a shop and petitioner had gone to purchase shoes. It seems that some altercation took place between them in course of transaction which turned into scuffle and exaggerating the circumstances, the present First Information Report has been registered. Petitioner is not having any criminal

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42149 of 2016 (2) dt.05-10-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of the application.

¶10

Considering the submissions as above, this application is allowed.

¶11

Let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Aurangabad in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶12

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶13

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶14

Vats/-c U T

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Azad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rabi Kant Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramkaliya Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Tiwari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shayam Babu @ Ram Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Malti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar