Allowed

Dharmendra Mishra @ Tuntun Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Oct 2016CR. MISC./42147/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with an FIR disclosing offences under Sections 467, 468, 406, and 120B of the IPC. Bail was to be available if the petitioner surrendered within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; to be released on surrender within six weeks on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties.

Dharmendra Mishra @ Tuntun Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42147 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2011 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Dharmendra Mishra @ Tuntun Mishra, Son of late Dhananjay Mishra, Resident of Village- Barwa, P.O. +P.S- Jamhore, District Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶3

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 220 of 2011, disclosing offences under Sections 467, 468, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before me a certified copy of the order dated 10.11.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49858 of 2015 and Criminal Miscellaneous No.44156 of 2015 whereby co-accused Kumkum Mishra and Surendra Mishra have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that case of the petitioner is on better footing than that of Surendra Mishra.

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42147 of 2016 (2) dt.06-10-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

Considering the submissions as above, this application

¶8

is allowed.

¶9

Let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 220 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶10

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶11

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶12

Vats/-c U T

Dharmendra Mishra @ Tuntun Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Mishra @ Tuntun Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shayam Babu @ Ram Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Malti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Singh @ Aayush Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramun Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Satish Kumar @ Bablu Sao @ Babloo Sao and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivan Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar