Allowed

Jhaksu Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Sept 2016CR. MISC./41623/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366A IPC. The court was satisfied on the counsel's submission regarding inconsistencies between the FIR and the victim's recorded statement, granting bail subject to standard conditions and a requirement to appear before authorities as needed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the same amount, subject to conditions of appearing before police/court and bail cancellation for failure to app

Jhaksu Sahni and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41623 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== 1. Jhaksu Sahni Son of Late Banarsi Sahni @ Lakhan Sahni 2. Balram Sahni Son of Jhaksu Sahni 3. Anita Devi Wife of Jhaksu Sahni All are residents of Village Kamalpur, Police Station - Khagaria, District - Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶4

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Khagaria (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be right in his submission that statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-2 to this application falsifies the case of the prosecution as narrated in the First Information Report.

¶6

Considering the submissions as above, this application

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41623 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

is allowed.

¶10

Let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶11

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶12

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶13

Vats/-c

¶14

U T

Jhaksu Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jhaksu Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veena Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Madho Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajan Kumar Rajak @ Indal Vs The State Of Bihar

Saheb Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Udaykant Chaudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar