Allowed

Madho Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Sept 2016CR. MISC./41120/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC related to a forged khatiyan. The court considered the documentary nature of the evidence, ruling that no tampering was likely.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to standard conditions.

Madho Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41120 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -KUSHESHWARSTHAN DistrictDARBHANGA ====================================================== 1. Madho Yadav Son of Thakko Yadav Resident of Village- Kewatgama, PS Kusheshwar Asthan , District Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 28-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶5

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kusheshwar Asthan Police Station Case No. 39 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

The Circle Officer of Kusheshwar Asthan (East) is the informant. In connection with certain proceedings pending before him, the petitioner is said to have submitted certain documents, including certified copy of khatiyan, which, on enquiry, has been found to be forged.

¶7

Learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner had obtained the certified copy through proper means and if forged

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41120 of 2016 (2) dt.28-09-2016

¶9

2/3

¶10

certified copy was supplied to him, the petitioner cannot be blamed.

¶11

I do not intend to comment upon the plea that acting bona fide, the petitioner received forged certified copy and submitted the same in a proceeding before the Circle Officer, which was, evidently, going to strengthen his case.

¶12

However, considering the aspect that the evidence to prove the case against the petitioner is documentary in nature and there is no likelihood of tampering with the said document by the petitioner, this application is allowed.

¶13

Let the petitioner, Madho Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul, Darbhanga, in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan Police Station Case No. 39 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41120 of 2016 (2) dt.28-09-2016

¶16

3/3

¶17

failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶18

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶19

Prabhakar Anand/-c
U √ T √

Madho Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madho Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipeen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Manindra Singh @ Manindra Nath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Veena Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar