Allowed

Md. Amzad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2016CR. MISC./34784/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising out of an FIR for murder and abetment, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, father of a co-accused who did not implicate him as a killer, on furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to enlarge the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vth, Purnea.

Md. Amzad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34784 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2016 Thana -KASBA District- PURNIA ====================================================== 1. Md. Amzad Son of Sonaruddin resident of Village- Ghogha Raja Bari, Police Station- Kasba in the district of Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 3 08-11-2016 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in Kasba P.S. Case No. 24 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The police lodged FIR against unknown after receiving dead body of the deceased. Later on, the deceased was identified as Md. Hasibur Rahman. During course of the investigation, one Sakur Alam was apprehended and he is said to have confessed his guilt. He disclosed that he along with others killed Hasibur Rahman and thrown his dead body in a maize field. It is further disclosed that the deceased had gone along with father of Sakur Alam for taking money for business of Bidi.

¶4

It is submitted that there is no material against the

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34784 of 2016 (3) dt.08-11-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

petitioner. Of course, the motorcycle and other articles of the deceased were recovered from different places. The petitioner is father of co-accused Sakur Alam and that is why the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case.

¶8

Learned Additional P.P. did not dispute the fact.

¶9

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that Md. Sakur Alam did not disclose the name of the petitioner as killer of the deceased, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vth, Purnea in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No. 24 of 2016.

¶10

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶11

Rakhi

¶12

U T

Md. Amzad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Amzad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hafudin Mian @ Haffuddin Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhananjay Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Investigating Officer, Excise Department , Dist. Rohtas

Bharat Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Rai @ Lilku Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jagnnath Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar