The Patna High Court dismissed a bail petition filed by Pappu Singh, who was in custody for offences against property. The court declined bail citing the gravity of the offence and the petitioner's criminal antecedents.
The bail petition stands dismissed. The petitioner remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32974 of 2016 (2) dt.22-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32974 of 2016
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2015 Thana -LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Pappu Singh @ Debu Singh Son of Ashok Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Sarfuddin Shivaji Nagar, Police Station- Town, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance: |
|
|---|---|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 22-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2016 in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No. 298 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as there is no material to support the accusation that the petitioner’s SIM had been used in the stolen Nokia mobile and there is no recovery of stolen Nokia mobile from the conscious possession of the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of the offence alleged as well as the criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) |
| Chan U |
dran/Ibrar T |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner accused of offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code who alleges false implication regarding a stolen mobile phone.
Whether the lack of recovery of the stolen mobile phone from the petitioner's possession warrants the grant of bail.
Pappu Singh @ Debu Singh
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
