Allowed

Prahalad Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Aug 2016CR. MISC./33063/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application arising from a police station case involving offences under IPC and the Arms Act, the Patna High Court released the petitioner on regular bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, adhering to specified conditions.

Prahalad Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33063 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2016 Thana -DIDARGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Prahalad Rai S/o Ramchandra Rai, Resident of Village- Jethuli, P.S.Fatuha, District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 20-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

The petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2016 in connection with Didarganj P. S. Case No. 55 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶8

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated at the instance of his enemies. The FIR has been instituted belatedly on 10.03.2016 for the alleged occurrence of 09.03.2016.

¶9

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33063 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016

¶11

¶12

of Sri Anant Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Didarganj P. S. Case No. 55 of 2016 on the following conditions -

¶13

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶14

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

¶15

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶16

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶17

Chandran/Ibrar

¶18

U T

Prahalad Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahalad Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Kumar @ Langera @ Doman Yadav @ Dawn Vs The State Of Bihar Through Econommic Offence Dept, Bihar Patna

Bikru Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikram Dom Vs The State Of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Lelhu Yadav @ Lelhu Vs The State Of Bihar

Saro Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Munna Mian @ MD Munna Vs The State Of Bihar