Allowed

Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2016CR. MISC./32821/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to Umesh Yadav, who was in custody since January 3, 2016, for offenses under the IPC and Arms Act. The court recognized false implication and limited recovery, ordering his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail via bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara, subject to conditions of attendance and presence of close relative as bailee.

Umesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32821 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -BHOJPUR GRP CASE District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Umesh Yadav son of Late Lallan Yadav resident of Village- Mathila Dera, P.S. - Karan Sarai, District- Buxar

¶3

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 16-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2016 in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1b)a, 26 and 36 of the Arms Act.

¶4

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and except recovery of two cartridges and mobile phone from the pocket of the petitioner, no other incriminating goods have been recovered from his possession.

¶5

Having regard to the period of custody of the above named petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016, with the following condition:-

¶6

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32821 of 2016 (2) dt.16-08-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

petitioner.

¶10

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on three consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

¶11

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶12

B.T/Chandran U T

Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhirendra Pd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mohfijur Rahman @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anju Rani Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shamshad Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Nirmal @ Ram Pragash Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Paltu Kumar Yadav @ Paltu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar