Single judge oral order granting bail to petitioner arrested in an Arms Act case, conditioned upon furnishing a bond and two sureties and attending trial dates.
Petitioner released on bail with security bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each along with specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32809 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2016 Thana -FALKA District- KATIHAR
====================================================== Paltu Kumar Yadav @ Paltu Yadav, S/o Sita Ram Yadav, Resident of village - Rangakol, P.S.- Falka, District - Katihar
.... .... Petitioner
The State of Bihar
Versus .... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 16-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner;
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32809 of 2016 (2) dt.16-08-2016
2/2
(2) That the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on three consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/-Ibrar
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be released on bail in PS Case No. 30 of 2016 arising under the Arms Act.
Paltu Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
