Petitioners sought quashing of an order directing issuance of process in a criminal complaint case. The court found a prima facie case and dismissed the application, allowing petitioners to raise points at charge framing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32216 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. 905 Year- 2011 Thana –Complaint Case District- MUNGER
===========================================================
All resident of Mohalla- Thana Road, Sultanganj, P.S. - Sultanganj, DistrictBhagalpur
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Parties
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Gupta, Advocate For the State : APP
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2016
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for
the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32216 of 2013 dt.06-12-2016
2/2
498A of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the opposite party no. 2 and other family members
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/Chandran
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
07.12.2016 |
| Transmission Date |
07.12.2016 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order directing issuance of process should be quashed at this stage.
Rita Devi @ Rita Kumari and others
The State of Bihar and Guru Prasad Choudhary
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
