Dismissed

Sajjan Kumar Hisariya and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 Dec 2016CR. MISC./31845/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed to quash a Domestic Violence Act complaint. The High Court declined to interfere at the filing stage, dismissing the petition but directing the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously within 60 days under Section 12(5) of the DV Act.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed; the trial was directed to be concluded within 60 days.

Sajjan Kumar Hisariya and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31845 of 2013

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2011 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Sajjan Kumar Hisariya Son of Sri Banbari Lal Hisariya

¶6

Mrs. Neelam Hisariya Wife of Sajjan Kumar Hisariya

¶7

Nihar Hisariya @ Nihar Sajjan Son of Sajjan Kumar Hisariya All resident of 503/4, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, P.S.-Gandhi Maidan, Dist.-Patna.

¶8

.... .... Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Bihar

¶11

Smita Dutta, Wife of Rahul Ranjan, Resident of 503/4, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, P.S. - Gandhi Maidan, Dist.-Patna at present C-304 Charminar Apartment

¶12

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance:

¶14

For the Petitioners : Mr. Vindhya Keshari Kumar, Sr. Advocate For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Angad Kunwar, Advocate Mr. Rajni Kant Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP

¶15

===========================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2016

¶17

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners, learned

¶18

counsel for the OP No. 2 and learned APP for the State.

¶19

The present petition has been filed for quashing the complaint in Domestic Violence Case No. 44 of 2011, pending before the Court of Sri A.K. Ram, learned Munsif II-cum-Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna.

¶20

The petitioners are the father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the OP No. 2 respectively. The son of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 had solemnized love marriage with the OP No. 2 on

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31845 of 2013 dt.06-12-2016

¶22

¶23

19.04.2009 at Chennai.

¶24

Mr. Vindhya Kesri Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is false and concocted and they have no concern with the day-to-day matters of the OP No. 2 or her husband.

¶25

Learned counsel for the OP No. 2 appears and has been heard. He relies on the counter affidavit to submit that the trial is in progress according to which, inter alia , one witness namely, Ajay Kumar has been examined on 23.02.2016.

¶26

Having regard to the nature of the allegations in the complaint, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. The petition is accordingly dismissed, with the direction, having regard to the provisions of Section 12(5) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, that the trial shall be concluded expeditiously, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment.

¶27

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶28

Chandran/BT

¶29

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	09.12.2016
Transmission Date	09.12.2016

Sajjan Kumar Hisariya and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajjan Kumar Hisariya and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daya Sagar Prasad Vs Shri Anjani Kumar Singh and Ors.

Saroj Kumar Jha Vs The Debts Recovery Tribunal Through Its Registrar, Patna. and Ors.

M/s Diamond Construction Through The Proprietor Shri Satendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rita Devi @ Rita Kumari and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rakesh Kumar Gupta prop Of M/s Nav Jeevan Ultrasound and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vimal Parashar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.