Dismissed

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Nov 2016CR. MISC./31732/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The court held that the petitioner's apprehension of arrest was misplaced as other accused were already on bail and did not enlarge him, directing surrender for regular bail consideration.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application rejected. Petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail consideration.

Upendra Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31732 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -AKBARNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Upendra Mandal, S/o- Late Sita Ram Mandal, resident of Village:Mirjapur, Ghogha, P.S.:- Kahalgaon (Ghogha), District:- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶3

5 10-11-2016 Heard both sides.

¶4

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 39/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

The informant alleged that she went along with Kare Mandal to see Ghogha market. Kare Mandal kept her in the house of the petitioner Upendra Mandal and thereafter solemnized her marriage to one unknown person.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that victim is a married woman. She got a child in her lap. The victim recorded her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In her statement she stated altogether a different story about the occurrence. The allegation on the face of it appears to be concocted one. All other

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31732 of 2016 (5) dt.10-11-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

accused persons have already been granted regular bail. The case of the petitioner stands on the same footing, but it appears that the victim herself alleged that the petitioner confined her in his house and got her married.

¶10

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

¶11

If the petitioner surrenders in the court below learned court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner taking into consideration that other accused persons have been granted regular bail and dispose of the bail petition of the petitioner on the same day.

¶12

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶13

Vinita/U T

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Promod Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudama Kumar Rai @ Sudama Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Nilesh Chandra Vs The State Of Bihar

Pashupati Prasad Borauliya Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.