Allowed

Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Oct 2016CR. MISC./31166/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants anticipatory bail to Krishna Prasad, who feared arrest in a case alleging kidnapping and criminal intimidation. Bail was conditioned on surrender within five weeks and furnishing a bond to the City Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to surrender within five weeks and depositing bond amounts of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Krishna Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31166 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -272 Year- 2016 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD

¶3

====================================================== Krishna Prasad Son of Late Nilami Mahto, resident of Village - Babhana, Police Station and District - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party. ======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Prasad, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt. Gulnar Begam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

03 05-10-2016

¶5

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jehanabad P.S. Case No.272 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 366 and

¶6

506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The allegation by the informant is that he was taking his physically challenged wife to see their 14 years old son, who was sick. On reaching the bus stop, she was asked to sit on bench and he went to make some purchase. After return, he was told that Santu Kumar and Sashi Kumar, the sons of the petitioner, came and took her away telling the neighbour that taking to get some form written. On the next day, it is alleged that the petitioner threatened the informant as to why he had gone to the Superintendent of Police to make complaint. Thereafter, this F.I.R. is being lodged.

¶8

It is submitted that this petitioner has no role to play whatever has been done. The two sons of the petitioner to whom

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31166 of 2016 (03) dt.05-10-2016

¶10

- 2 -

¶11

petitioner has no concern.

¶12

Learned A.P.P. points out that the girl has not yet been recovered nor the two sons of the petitioner are available anywhere.

¶13

Be that as it may, as the main role has been ascribed to the two sons of the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within five weeks from today, the petitioner abovenamed shall be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No.272 of 2016, subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

¶14

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)

¶15

Trivedi/-

¶16

U T

Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Mustakim and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramdeo Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Rai @ Suresh Roy and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Uday Pratap Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Miss Roja and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar