Allowed

Sikindar Sah @ Satendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Oct 2016CR. MISC./30931/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking anticipatory bail in a kidnapping case allege the FIR was filed in retaliation for a prior complaint. The High Court allows conditional bail if they surrender within five weeks by furnishing bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners shall be released on bail if they surrender within five weeks by furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount subject to conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.

Sikindar Sah @ Satendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah and Ors. Vs… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No 30931 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2016 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== 1. SIKINDAR SAH @ SATENDRA SAH @ SATYENDRA SAH S/o Ram Briksh Sah 2. Chitranjan Sah S/o Sonfi Sah 3. Sonfi Sah @ Sonafi Sah S/o Ram Briksh Sah All R/o village - Baligadh Deuna Bujurg, P.S.-Runni-Saidpur, District-Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶3

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan For the I n f o r m a n t : Mr Ashok Kr

¶4

====================================================== CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH

¶5

ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 04-10-2016 The petitioners, who are family members, apprehend arrest in Runni-Saidpur Police Station (PS) Case No 142 of 2016 instituted under Sections 364/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶7

It is alleged that the petitioners have take away the minor child of the informant to get job for him at Ludhiana but the child is not being returned now. He is traceless.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact this is a false and concocted case inasmuch as before this, a complaint had been filed by petitioner No 3 who is the father of petitioner No 2 and cousin of petitioner No 1 as against the informant Krishnandan Sah being Complaint Case No 404 of 2016

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30931 of 2016 (3) dt.04-10-2016

¶10

2/2

¶11

on which learned Magistrate, having taken cognizance on 21.03.2016, referred the matter for enquiry to the police under Section 192 of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr P C). It is only in retaliation thereto that the present case has subsequently been lodged also as a complaint which was later referred to police under Section 156 (3) of Cr P C.

¶12

Be that as it may, in the event of their arrest or surrender within five weeks from today, the petitioners abovenamed shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Runni-Saidpur PS Case No 142 of 2016 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Cr P C.

¶13

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)

¶14

M.E.H. /-

¶15

Sikindar Sah @ Satendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikindar Sah @ Satendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sumir Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Lt. Col. Retd. Shiv Nath Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Kumar Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Mustakim and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramdeo Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar