In an oral order, the court rejected the petitioner's second prayer for bail in a cheating case. Having found no reason to review the earlier order as three witnesses were examined, the court dismissed the application and directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.
Prayer for bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27077 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -299 Year- 2014 Thana -CIVIL LINE District- GAYA
====================================================== Md. Suyaib @ Md. Suhaib son of Md. Imteyaz, resident of village Kandi Nawada, P.S. Chandawati, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahtab Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kr. Rakesh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 5 27-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Civil Line P.S. case No.299 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya.
It has been submitted that three out of five witnesses have already been examined and hence, I find no reason for reviewing the earlier order refusing bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is once again rejected.
The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments to any party and take stringent actions against non-appearing witnesses.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail to the petitioner should be granted given that three out of five witnesses have been examined.
Md. Suyaib @ Md. Suhaib
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
