The Patna High Court granted bail to Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary in a Vigilance case, fixing sureties.
Release on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25977 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2016 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== 1. Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary Son of Late Sahdeo Choudhary resident of Village - Rahimpur, Police Station - Khagaria, District - Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance P.S. Patna, Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.S.P.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 04-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance Department as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is said to be caught by the vigilance accepting Rs.4000/- as bribe from allegation maker, namely, Prakash Kumar. Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the aforesaid Prakash Kumar as well as several other persons were made accused in Saraiya ( Jaitpur) P.S.Case No. 80 of 2016 and in the aforesaid case, petitioner had sustained injury. Subsequently, the aforesaid Prakash Kumar as well as several others got bail in the aforesaid Saraiya ( Jaitpur) P.S.Case No. 80
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25977 of 2016 (3) dt.04-07-2016
2/2
of 2016 and with an intent to pressurize the petitioner so that he could not give evidence in the aforesaid case, the informant in connivance with the vigilance officials got instituted this false case.
case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at Para-7 of the petition, it has specifically been pleaded that one Indrajeet Singh is relative of the aforesaid Prakash Kumar and the said Indrajeet Singh knitted the entire game and got implicated the petitioner in this case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur in Special Case No. 20 of 2016 in connection with Vigilance P.S.Case No. 43 of 2016.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
N.K/-
U T
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail amounting to the allegations and facts of pending prosecution
Whether to release the petitioner on bail in concerns of Vigilance P.S. Case
Whether to quash the proceedings against the petty and bench
Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary
The State of Bihar
The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance P.S. Patna
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
