The High Court at Patna dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging an order of cognizance, holding the petition infructuous as the trial had concluded and the petitioner was acquitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25800 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -392 Year- 2011 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Binay Kumar Gupta @ Chunnu Gupta, son of Late Gupteshwar Prasad Gupta, resident of Mohalla- Satsang Nagar, Dak Bunglow Road, Police Station- Sherghati, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashish For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 05-04-2016 Sri Ramashish, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri Uma Nath Mishra, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous keeping in view the fact that though the present petition was filed against the order of cognizance, during pendency of the petition, the trial has already been concluded and petitioner was acquitted.
The petition stands dismissed as the same has become infructuous. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/U
Binay Kumar Gupta @ Chunnu Gupta
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
