In a civil writ petition, the High Court at Patna dismissed the petition due to non-prosecution as no party appeared on the hearing date to press the matter or file supplementary affidavits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14074 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Brajesh Kumar & Anr .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. None For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to SC-18 |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 5 |
04-04-2016 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either |
| to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On last | |
| two dates, the case was being adjourned for filing supplementary affidavit. On perusal of the record, it appears no supplementary |
|
| affidavit has been filed. Learned AC to SC-18 is present. | |
| The writ petition stands dismissed due to non- | |
| prosecution. | |
| (Rakesh Kumar, J) | |
| NKS/- U |
Brajesh Kumar & Anr
The State of Bihar & Ors
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
