Allowed

Dhirendra Singh @ Munda Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jun 2016CR. MISC./24711/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, accused in a PS case involving sections of the IPC including theft and attempt to murder. The court allowed release upon surrender within four weeks, subject to furnishing bail bonds and sureties, distinguishing the petitioner's unarmed status from other F.I.R. accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon surrender within four weeks by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

Dhirendra Singh @ Munda Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24711 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2016 Thana -AMBA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Dhirendra Singh @ Munda Singh, S/o Late Ramnandan Singh, R/o Village Balia, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 14-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶3

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Petitioner is named in the First Information Report and it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons went at the house of the informant and co-accused Yogendra Singh, Rahul Kumar, Roshan Kumar and Deepak Kumar @ Sani assaulted the injured persons of this case by means of different weapons and subsequently, all the F.I.R. named accused, having entered into the house of the informant, snatched a gold chain and other articles.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24711 of 2016 (2) dt.14-06-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner and he is only said to be a member of mob but as a matter of fact, the petitioner has been implicated in this case on account of previous enmity. From reading of para-3 of the petition, it shows that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and moreover, according to the informant’s case itself, at the time of alleged occurrence, petitioner was unarmed.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in Amba P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶10

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶11

rohit/kunal/-

¶12

U T

Dhirendra Singh @ Munda Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Singh @ Munda Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk Ajij @ Sk Ajit Vs The State Of Bihar

Subhas Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bijay Kumar @ Bijay Kumar Singh @ Tuttu Vs The State Of Bihar

Yadunandan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shanti Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.