Allowed

Md. Parvez Alam @ Premi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2016CR. MISC./21344/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of arms offences under the Arms Act, subject to conditions including a bail bond, sureties, reporting requirements, and strict compliance with future court proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000/- bond with two sureties and reporting to police station by 7th of every month for six months.

Md. Parvez Alam @ Premi Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21344 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2015 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER

¶3

====================================================== Md. Parvez Alam @ Premi Son of Md. Jamal, Resident of VillageMirjapur Baradah, P.S.- Munger Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 20-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶4

The counsel for the petitioner is directed to make necessary correction in paragraph 11 of this petition.

¶5

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Munger (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 242 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 25(1-b)A, 25(1-A), 25(1AA), 25(1-AC) 26(i) (ii) (iii) of the Arms Act.

¶6

Allegation has been made to be a member of persons who are said to have been manufactured the gun and running a factory of gun from where certain instruments were recovered

¶7

The counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, he has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 26.11.2015.

¶8

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21344 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016

¶10

2/2

¶11

let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Munger in connection with Munger (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 242 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to the nearest police station by 7^th of every month, at least for six months. In case of failure, his bail will be treated to have been cancelled.

¶12

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶13

Mahesh/-

¶14

U T

Md. Parvez Alam @ Premi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Parvez Alam @ Premi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Husna Bano Vs The State Of Bihar

Garjan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Manouar @ Mansoor Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar