Patna High Court rejected the bail petition of Mukesh Yadav accused of offences under the Arms Act from which a gun was recovered, noting his history of similar cases.
Petition rejected; liberty to renew prayer for bail after one year of custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21150 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21150 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2015 Thana -BALIA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav S/o Late Yogendra Yadav, R/o Village- Bari Ballia, P.S.Ballia, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 19-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 343 of 2015 registered for offence under section 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. From the possession of the petitioner, the gun was recovered. The petitioner has large number of cases of similar nature over his head. At present this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is rejected. However, liberty is given to the petitioner, he may renew his prayer for bail after one year of custody. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with offences under the Arms Act from which a gun was recovered.
Whether the petitioner, having multiple similar pending cases, is entitled to bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
