Disposed
Santu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./21012/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Cr.Misc. No.21012 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21012 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21012 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== 1. Santu Prasad, Son of Ramdhin Mahto, resident of Village Gotia, P.S. Asthawawn, District Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Arun Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 20.05.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 376 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 27 of the Arms Act. The written report of the informant reflects that she was a consenting party and so far as non-payment of wages is concerned, the same was due upon father of the petitioner. Moreover, petitioner in jail custody since 21.2.2016. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Mahila P.S. Case no. 75/2015. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)
shahid U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail in a case involving large-scale abetment for committing dacoity with murder.
Whether the consent of the accused does not disentitle a complainant to file the proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santu Prasad
The State of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court