In an oral order, this court granted bail to the petitioner who was an accused in a case involving offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act, directing him to furnish a bail bond with two sureties.
Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, one being a close relative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20843 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20843 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2015 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- NAWADA ====================================================== Mukesh Singh, son of Suresh Singh, Resident of Village- Rame, P.S.Nardiganj, P.S.- Kacchura, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K. Khare (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 19-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 167 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3(i)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation of informant is that on 30.11.2015, he was going to shop for purchasing of Airtel Coupon, in the way, four persons including the petitioner started to abuse and assault him. On raising alarm, when Sanjay Manjhi came to save him then he was also assaulted by the accused persons. At that time, all accused persons named in the F.I.R. including the petitioner opened fire in order to create terror. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20843 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016
petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Moreover, no injury was found on the person of the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner is accused in one other case, in which, he is on bail and is in custody since 17.02.2016.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Nawada, in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 167 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
Bhardwaj/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail after being accused in a cases involving SC/ST atrocities and Arms Act.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mukesh Singh
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
