Allowed

Murat Yadav @ Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 May 2016CR. MISC./20685/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 304(B), 120(B), and 201/34 IPC arising from a dowry death case, the High Court of Patna directed the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioner to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equivalent amount to the Addl. Sessions Judge-III, Bagaha.

Murat Yadav @ Bharat Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20685 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -354 Year- 2015 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

====================================================== Murat Yadav @ Bharat Yadav, son of Late Gajar Yadav, resident of Village- Harpur Puraina, Police Station- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran (Bettiah). .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Panday(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 17-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶5

The petitioner is accused in connection with Bagaha (Bhairoganj) P.S. Case No. 354 of 2015, registered under Section 304(B), 120(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

The accusation is that the marriage of the sister of the informant was performed with Santosh Yadav, son of the petitioner, before six and half years ago. After the marriage, she was being tortured due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry by her husband and other in-laws. Later on, the dead body was recovered in two pieces from the field of one Suresh Singh.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, the deceased is the wife of Santosh Yadav, son of the

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20685 of 2016 (2) dt.17-05-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

petitioner, who left the house, on search, no trace was found, but later on, her dead body was found in the field. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased has falsely been implicated mere on suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 27.08.2015.

¶11

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge-III, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha (Bhairoganj) P.S. Case No. 354 of 2015.

¶12

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶13

manish/-

¶14

U T

Murat Yadav @ Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murat Yadav @ Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Manjhi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Achchelal Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sattar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Chhote Alam Vs The State Of Bihar