The Patna High Court dismissed a petition invoking inherent jurisdiction to quash an order rejecting an application for discharge. No apparent error was found in the lower court's order.
The petition to quash the impugned order was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20501 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2009 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Ramjee Ram S/o Late Moti Ram Resident of Village and Post- Katesar, P.S- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
From perusal of material on record particularly the F.I.R. it is evident that the case was instituted on an allegation of misappropriation of fund in the Flood Relief Scheme. Earlier in this case, case diary was called for which has been received and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20501 of 2014 (5) dt.12-08-2016
2/2
kept on record. After going through the impugned order and material on record I do not find any apparent error warranting interference with the impugned order.
The petition stands dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below
forthwith.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the order rejecting the application for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramjee Ram
The State of Bihar
Shailendra Nath
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
