Allowed

Biritish Kumar @ British Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2016CR. MISC./19788/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge High Court order granting bail to the petitioner, an accused in a rioting case, who was not named in the FIR but implicated during investigation, directing release on furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directed release on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each; one surety must be a close parent or relative.

Biritish Kumar @ British Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19788 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ====================================================== Biritish Kumar @ British Kumar Yadav, Son of Late Shyamdeo Yadav @ Late Shyam Yadav, Resident of Village - Khaira Mushhari, P.S. - Khaira, District - Jamui. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶3

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016, registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, it has only come in the statement of witnesses in para 7, 8 and 9 of the case diary that at that time accused were talking to each other denoting the name of petitioner British Yadav, Amarjeet, Rohit and Mahesh, except that there is nothing against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. The petitioner is accused in three cases in which he is on bail due to that reason,

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19788 of 2016 (2) dt.13-05-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

the petitioner has been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2016.

¶8

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Jamui in connection with Sono P.S.Case No. 01 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner .

¶9

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶10

manish/-

¶11

U T

Biritish Kumar @ British Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biritish Kumar @ British Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Changuri Yadav @ Jhanguri Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramlagan Bhuiyan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Mahton Vs The State Of Bihar

Satrudhan Rai Vs The State Of Bihar