Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2016 Thana -ITADHI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ J.k. @ Jammu Bin Son of Munarik Singh @ Mundrika Ram @ Mundrika Bin Resident of village- Sikraul Tetrahar, P.S.Sikraul, District- Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Nazir Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 10-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 20 of 2016 registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that the informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence rather he disclosed the name of three persons mere on suspicion. Out of them, one Aman Singh disclosed the name of this petitioner in his confessional statement having hand in the present case. Except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner to show the involvement in the present case. It is also submitted that