Allowed

Mahendra Prasad @ Digal Singh @ Gigal Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC9 May 2016CR. MISC./13739/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous appeal regarding bail application. Petitioner accused under Section 420 IPC in a land fraud case. Court directed release on bail upon furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, one being close relative.

Mahendra Prasad @ Digal Singh @ Gigal Singh Vs State Of… — Property and Title | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13739 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1306 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA

¶3

====================================================== MAHENDRA PRASAD @ DIGAL SINGH @ GIGAL SINGH, Son of Late Ram Nath Singh, Resident of Village : Sabbalpur, Raipur Hasan, P.O. Babhan Toli, P.S. Sonepur, District : Saran. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ramesh Roy S/o Rajendra Roy Vill. : Sabbalpur, Raypur Hasan, P.O. : - Babhan Toli, P.S. Sonepur, District : Saran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rekha Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶4

3 09-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶5

The petitioner is accused in connection with Complaint Case No. 1306 of 2014, registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

The prosecution case is that petitioner approached the complainant Ramesh Rai and witnesses to sale the land out of 68 decimals as purchased by him in village Khaspur from one Kismati Devi. Thereafter, the petitioner and others purchased three katha five dhur land of said land on payment of Rs. 1127000/-, but the possession was not handed over to the complainant and witnesses came to know about filing of Title Case No. 111 of 2013 with respect to the same land, which was

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13739 of 2016 (3) dt.09-05-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

decided in favour of plaintiff Smt. Gauri Yadav and against vendor of the petitioner.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner purchased the 68 decimal land to one Kismati Devi through sale deed dated 01.11.2012 filed the T.S. No. 111 of 2015 Smt. Gauri Yadav regarding the same land, but only Kismati Devi vendor of petitioner was not made party in that suit as such the petitioner has no knowledge about filing the suit and decree is passed behind the petitioner. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 12.02.2016.

¶11

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 1306 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner .

¶12

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶13

manish/U T

Mahendra Prasad @ Digal Singh @ Gigal Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Prasad @ Digal Singh @ Gigal Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Heera Choudhary @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Khusho Tanti Vs The State Of Bihar

Amarnath Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Tej Narain Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Ram Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar