Dismissed

Lalit Narayan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2016CR. MISC./18851/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by Lalit Narayan Chaudhary regarding offences under the IPC. The Court noted that the petitioner had previously faced rejection for identical allegations in another case, leading to a direction to surrender for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Rejection of anticipatory bail; direction to surrender within four weeks for regular bail.

Lalit Narayan Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18851 of 2016 (5) dt.21-09-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18851 of 2016

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -313 Year- 2015 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR

¶5

====================================================== 1. Lalit Narayan Chaudhary S/o Late Ram Niwas Chaudhary resident of vill. - Kritpura, P.S. Koilwar, Distt. - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the State : Mr. Ramesh Chandra (App) For the informant : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey Mr. A. K. Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶6

5 21-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶7

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Ara Nawada Police Station Case No. 313 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 419/420/467/ 468/471/379/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

It has been pointed out by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant that with identical allegation against the petitioner in relation to different transactions, another First Information Report, being Ara Nawada Police Station Case No. 256 of 2015 has been registered. He has submitted that application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in the said Ara Nawada Police Station Case No. 256 of 2015 has been

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18851 of 2016 (5) dt.21-09-2016

¶10

rejected vide order, dated 15.07.2016, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 17224 of 20165.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that allegation in the said First Information Report, giving rise to Ara Nawada Police Station Case No. 256 of 2015, is identical to the allegation made in the present First Information Report.

¶12

I have perused the order of the Court, dated 15.07.2016, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 17224 of 2016.

¶13

Considering the said order, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶14

This application for anticipatory bail, is hereby, rejected.

¶15

The petitioner, Lalit Narayan Chaudhary, is directed to surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶16

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶17

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶18

U √ T √

Lalit Narayan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalit Narayan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

The Managing Director, Bihar Fruit And Vegetable Development Corporation Ltd., Patna and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raja Kewat Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahendra Mukhiya and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar