Allowed

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2016CR. MISC./37166/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners arrested or likely to be arrested in a criminal case alleging assault and criminal intimidation. The court fixed the bail bond amount and conditions for their release.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount under conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37166 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37166 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BEGUSARAI

¶4

====================================================== 1. Rajesh Kumar 2. Mukesh Kumar

¶5

Both Sons of Ram Udgar Mahton

¶6

Ram Udgar Mahton Son of Basude Mahton

¶7

Basudeo Mahton, Son of Late Lirash Mahto

¶8

Deepak Kumar, Son of Ram Udgar Mahton. All resident of Village- Jokia Tarin Telan, P.S. Bhagwanpur, DistrictBegusarai.

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 20-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 85 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 341/347/323/308/ 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

In the background of a dispute between the families of the informant and the petitioners, the occurrence is said to have taken place.

¶17

It is alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant and his father with lathi and danda.

¶18

It is evident from the First Information Report

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37166 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016

¶20

that there is some dispute between the parties, which had led to the occurrence alleged.

¶21

Considering the above submission, this application is allowed.

¶22

Let the petitioners, namely, Rajesh Kumar, Mukesh Kumar, Ram Udgar Mahton, Basudeo Mahton and Deepak Kumar, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 85 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶24

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶25

Prabhakar Anand/-

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Annu @ Annu Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar

Sita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Fakharuddin @ Fakharuddin and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Aruna Devi Vs The State Of Bihar