The High Court, at the request of petitioners' counsel, allowed withdrawal of an application under CrPC Section 482 seeking quashing of an order taking cognizance, as the trial had concluded during its pendency. The application was disposed of accordingly without substantive examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13323 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2013 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)
====================================================== 1. Sarita Devi wife of Badri Prasad 2. Badri Prasad S/o Late Jehan Mahto Both resident of Mohalla- Bari Pahari, P. S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioners Versus
3 26-04-2016 At the outset, it has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that during the pendency of the present application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of the order taking cognizance, the trial itself has come to an end.
In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present application.
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/U T
Sarita Devi
Badri Prasad
The State of Bihar
Ashok kumar Singh
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
