Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in PC case involving robbery and explosion of bombs. Court rejected prayer citing incriminating evidence against petitioner.
Anticipatory bail prayer rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13040 of 2016
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2015 Thana -KORHA District- KATIHAR |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== 1. Mozibur Rahman @ Lotu @ Hazibur Rahman Son of Adul Salam, resident of Village- Durgapur, P.S. Barari, District- Katihar. |
|
| .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar (App) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 18-04-2016 Heard. |
| The sole petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in | |
| Korha P.S. case no. 214 of 2015, registered under Sections 399, | |
| 402, 395, 307/34 of the IPC and diverse penal provisions of the | |
| Arms Act as also Section ¾ Explosive Substance Act. |
While going on motorcycle , it is alleged that accused persons intercepted and committed loot of the mobiles and other belongings . One accused was identified. In search of accuseds , informant went to the house of Naresh Mahto where the accused persons were hiding. In course of fleeing away therefrom bombs were exploded causing injury to the companions of the informant. From the impugned order it appears that in course of investigation, the incriminating materials have been
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13040 of 2016 (2) dt.18-04-2016
2/2
collected against the petitioner. Taking into account the allegations and the other attending facts/circumstances evidencing from the record , particularly, the impugned order I am not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer is, accordingly, rejected.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in cases alleging robbery and use of explosives?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mozibur Rahman @ Lotu @ Hazibur Rahman
The State of Bihar
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
