same for the reason that though the Authority was moved by Kumari Lalmuni against the appointment of the two persons but the same could not have been considered in isolation and, but necessarily, had to be in the larger context of the sanctity and validity of the entire selection process. Thus, had the Authority limited its enquiry only to the selection of Sushma Dayal and Charanjeet Kumar Singh, any finding would not have stood the test of judicial scrutiny as validity of the selection process could not have been gone into after bifurcating the same and limiting it only with regard to Kumari Lalmuni, Sushma Daya and Charanjeet Kumar Singh. Moreover, after having gone through the order of the Authority dated 13.08.2012, it is apparent that it has gone into all aspects of the matter and considered the whole appointment process and has found grave irregularities. Once the same has been noticed by the Authority, the natural result was to hold such selection process to be vitiated in its entirety and, thus, the order passed by the Authority is sound, both on facts as well as in law. Further, the order of the learned Single Bench dated 28.10.2013 is also well considered and does not require any interference.
