Words 0: The appeal was dismissed as intructuous based on the Opposition Parties' supplementary Affidavit stating that the appeal could not be prolonged.
None granted; appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.446 of 2014 Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18355 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)
Patna High Court LPA No.446 of 2014 (5) dt.06-09-2016
2/2
In view of the averments made in the supplementary
affidavit, learned counsel for the appellants states that the appeal has rendered infructuous.
The present Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Hemant Gupta, J)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P. Kumar/Anjani U
Magadh University, The (through Registrar, Vice Chancellor, Finance Officer)
Dr. Upendra Prasad Singh
Dr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra
Dr. Indrajit Prasad Roy
The Chancellor, Universities Of Bihar (and State of Bihar)
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
