C.R. No.53 of 2014 (2) dt.15-11-2016 IN THE…
Permission to withdraw application accorded; revision application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.R. No.53 of 2014 (2) dt.15-11-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.53 of 2014
====================================================== Sanjay Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Sri Raju Gope .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 2 15-11-2016 After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. The revision application is dismissed as withdrawn. (V. Nath, J) Nitesh/U
Sanjay Kumar
Sri Raju Gope
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
