Dismissed
Pawan Kumar v. Most. Manju Devi
Patna HCC.R./168/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
C.R. No.168 of 2016 (2) dt.10-11-2016 IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.R. No.168 of 2016 (2) dt.10-11-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.168 of 2016
| ====================================================== Pawan Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Most. Manju Devi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Ambastha For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 10-11-2016 The learned counsel for the petitioner, in response |
| to the objection to the maintainability of this revision application | |
| as raised by the office, has prayed to convert this revision | |
| application into a miscellaneous appeal. | |
| Without going into the merits of the prayer, the petitioner is permitted to convert this revision application into a miscellaneous appeal in course of the day, failing which the revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. The other defects as pointed out by the office shall |
|
| be considered after the conversion, as prayed. |
(V. Nath, J)
Nitesh/-
U
Pawan Kumar
Most. Manju Devi
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court