Review application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate remedy. Court declined to treat the setting aside of the relied-upon precedent as a valid ground for review.
Review application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to an appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.335 of 2013 (5) dt.09-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.335 of 2013 In LPA 1541 of 2012 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Mishra S/O Late Yogyanandn Mishra R/O Near Pokhraj Bari Chuna Bhathhi, Laxmi Nagar, P.S- Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga, Currently Residing At P.W.D. Colony, Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Deparment, Road Circle, Darbhanga. 4. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Darbhanga. 5. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Samastipur Division, Samastipur. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 5 09-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks review of the order dated 17.7.2013 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No.1541 of 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the judgment of an earlier Division Bench in the case of State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Minor Irrigation, Government of Bihar vs. Kusheshwar Nath Pandey: 2013 (1)
Patna High Court C. REV. No.335 of 2013 (5) dt.09-02-2015
P.L.J.R. 939 upon which this Court has relied upon in the order dated 17.7.2013 sought to be reviewed has subsequently been set aside by the Apex Court. The same cannot be a ground for review of the said decision.
In the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the review application with liberty to take recourse to an appropriate remedy in the matter.
The review application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
V.P.Sinha/-
(Anjana Mishra, J)
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review application should be allowed after the earlier judgment relied upon has been set aside by the Supreme Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Minor Irrigation, Government of Bihar vs. Kusheshwar Nath PandeyReferred¶2
State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Minor Irrigation, Government of Bihar vs. Kusheshwar Nath Pandey: 2013 (1) P.L.J.R. 939
Vijay Kumar Mishra
The State Of Bihar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
