In the absence of the petitioner to press the case against respondent no.12, the High Court of Patna dismissed the miscellaneous application for non-prosecution after finding the petitioner had no interest.
Application dismissed against respondent no.12 for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.638 of 1985 (15) dt.02-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.638 of 1985 ====================================================== Thru Raut, S/o Gena Raut, R/o Vill. Khajuria, P.S. Barauli, Dist. Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Smt. Lalghari Devi and Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15 02-02-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this case, when the case is called out. Perused the Office Notes. This application has been dismissed against opposite party no.12 due to non-compliance of the order dated 24.05.1995 within time. On the said date, none was present on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner has no interest in the case. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shail/U
Thru Raut, S/o Gena Raut
Smt. Lalghari Devi and Ors.
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
