Petitioner sought to transfer a dismissed matrimonial case. The petitioner did not appear and the application was disposed of without substantive consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1366 of 1993 =========================================================== Mirdula Bhagat, wife of Dhirendra Kumar Bhagat, daughter of Sri Bhola Nath Dey, resident of Mohalla-Shamsherganj, Bara Bazar, P.S. and District-Darbhanga. At present residing at Mohalla-Ojhapura, P.S. Dubrajpur, District-Birbhum (W.B.). .... .... Petitioner. Versus Dhirendra Kumar Bhagat, son of Sri Kedar Nath Bhagat, resident of MohallaShamsherganj, Bara Bazar, P.S. and District-Darbhanga. .... .... Opposite Party. =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Md..Khurshid Alam, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : M/s. Vijay Kumar Bhagat & Hari Shankar, Advocates. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-02-2015 ----------
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application when the case is called out, while Sri Vijay Kumar Bhagat, learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the present application has been filed to transfer Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No.05 of 1990 filed on behalf of the opposite party from the court of Civil Courts Darbhanga to the Civil Courts Dumka. The said Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No.05 of 1990 has already been disposed of on 11.08.1995 by the court of Second Additional District Judge, Darbhanga regarding which counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of opposite party.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court MJC No.1366 of 1993 dt.02-02-2015 2/2
opposite party, it appears that due to disposal of Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No.05 of 1990, the petitioner has lost her interest and is not taking interest in the matter.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
P.S./-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mirdula Bhagat
Dhirendra Kumar Bhagat
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
