Contempt application dismissed due to a prior order where the Secretary did not hear the petitioner. No opinion on substantive issues is expressed.
Contempt application dismissed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4544 of 2014
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15567 of 2011
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navendu Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sharad Kumar Sinha, GP-XV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 04-02-2015 In terms of order passed in CWJC No. 15567 of 2011, the Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board has passed the order vide order dated 24th November 2014. Grievance has been raised that though the petitioner was present but he was not heard, but the order shows otherwise.
This Court is not giving any opinion on the order passed by the Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board which has been brought through the show cause which has been filed today.
In view of the order aforesaid, there is no need to proceed in the matter any further. This contempt application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner that if he feels aggrieved, he may approach the appropriate forum.
The order has been passed in presence of counsel for
the State.
Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CWJC No. 15567 of 2011Referred¶1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalchand Prasad
Subhash Chandra Roy
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
