The petitioner submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on this ground.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9918 of 1996
===========================================================
M/S Kalyanpur Cement Limited
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Bihar State Electricity Board & others.
.... .... Respondent/s
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad &
M/s N. Chatterjee and Kumaresh Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj ballabh pd. Yadav, Adv.
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 03-02-2015
Shivaji Pandey,J Counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become
infructuous.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed having been rendered
infructuous.
Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J)
U
M/S Kalyanpur Cement Limited
Bihar State Electricity Board
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
