Girja Nandan Sahai v. the T.M.Bhagalpur University and
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed, rendering the petition infructuous, and it was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3623 of 2010
======================================================
Girja Nandan Sahai
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The T.M.Bhagalpur University & Ors.
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha
For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp19)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
10 30-10-2015 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance
of the petitioner has been redressed and such view of the matter,
this petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Jay/-
U
Girja Nandan Sahai
The T.M. Bhagalpur University
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court