The High Court dismissed an appeal against an order refusing relief, noting the appellants had previously lost in related writ petitions.
None granted; lower court order upheld subject to pending suit outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.519 of 2014
====================================================== Anup Kumar & Anr.
.... .... Appellant/s Versus Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Baxi SRP Sinha, Sr. Adv. M/s Vijay Bharti and Kumar Karan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
13 29-10-2015 In this case, appellants have challenged the order date
d 15 th January 2013 whereby and whereunder the court below has
refused to give relief to the appellants.
It is admitted fact that with regard to the issue
involved in the present case, the petitioner had approached this
Court in CWJC No. 5900 of 2010 and later on the same was
challenge d in LPA No. 824 of 2010. At both the places, the
present appellants lost.
In such view of the matter, it will not be justified and
proper for this court to interfere with the order of the court below
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. However, any action will be
subject to result of the suit and if the appellant succeeds t he court
below will pass necessary orders in accordance with law. The
court below is directed to expedite the trial, subject to co-operation
ext ended by the parties.
Jay/U
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Anup Kumar
Bihar State Financial Corporation
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
