The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt application held infructuous because the underlying writ proceeding was subsequently allowed by an order dismissing the original writ petition.
The contempt application was disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2869 of 2006
======================================================
Versus
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : None.
For the State : Mr. Kamal Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG-2
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court MJC No.2869 of 2006 (5) dt.04-02-2015 2/2
2 is present.
The present contempt application has been filed asserting non compliance of the order dated 10.08.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5603 of 2004.
The records of L.P.A. No.967 of 2006 show that the said L.P.A. was preferred against the order dated 10.08.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5603 of 2004 and the same was allowed vide order dated 02.12.2010 dismissing the C.W.J.C. No.5603 of 2004 in which the order dated 10.08.2005 under contempt was passed. As such, this application has become infructuous and no action is required to be taken against the concerned opposite parties.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
P.S./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application becomes infructuous when the original writ proceeding is allowed in the subsequent leave petition.
Dinesh Prasad Yadav and others
The State of Bihar and others
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
