The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw a contempt application. The High Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the application as not pressed on 29.07.2015.
Liberty to withdraw the contempt application allowed; application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2496 of 2014 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20735 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Kiran Bharti D/o Ram Yadav and Daughter-in-law of Bhubneshwari Yadav R/o Village and P.O. Loukaha, P.S. and District Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Ashish Kr. Sinha, Secretary Child Department. 2. Dr. Rashmi Kumari, Child Development Project Officer, Supaul. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER *************** 02. 29.07.2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Sanjana, on instruction, seeks liberty to withdraw this Contempt Application. Prayer is allowed. Contempt Application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/-
U
Kiran Bharti
The State of Bihar
Dr. Rashmi Kumari
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
