The Patna High Court dismissed a writ application wherein the petitioner seemingly lost his interest. The single judge held the application was unsustainable and dismissed it.
The writ application was dismissed as the petitioner was found to have lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10366 of 2011 (2) dt.29-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10366 of 2011
====================================================== 1. Madan Kumar Ray S/O Late Rasbihari Ray R/O Vill.- Dhanaha, P.S.Parihar, Distt.- Sitamarhi
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Old Secretariat, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.A. Alam SC3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
2 29-07-2015 None for the petitioner.
Petitioner seems to have lost his interest, looking at the nature of the relief and the object of filing of writ application at the relevant time.
Writ application is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
U
Madan Kumar Ray
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Home
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi
Phul Kumari Devi
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
