Disposed
Mokhtar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCMJC/2285/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
MJC No.2285 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015 IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2285 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2285 of 2014
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25294 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2284 of 2014 IN
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 816 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : (In MJC No.2285 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Prabhakar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary (In MJC No.2284 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Prabhakar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abbas Haider ======================================================
Patna High Court MJC No.2285 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 29-04-2015
Show cause reply has been filed on behalf of opposite party in both the cases stating therein that the order of suspension
has been revoked.
In view of the aforesaid statement, this Court is not
inclined to proceed any further.
However, It will be open for the petitioner to claim
consequential benefits from the department.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
singh/-
U
Mokhtar Prasad
The State of Bihar
Nagar Parishad, Chapra
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court