The petitioner had preferred an appeal before the D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Special Range, Delhi, which also stood rejected by an order dated 21.05.1999. It appears that the petitioner had preferred revision petition against the orders of the Disciplinary Authority, i.e., Commandant, C.R.P.F. and the Appellate Authority, i.e., D.I.G., C.R.P.F., before the Inspector General, C.R.P.F. Bihar Sector. The Inspector General by an order dated 04.10.1999, which has been brought on the record by way of counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, rejected the revision application also. The order of the Inspector General, C.R.P.F. is not under challenge in the present writ application and though no formal relief has been sought for quashing of the order passed by the Inspector General, C.R.P.F. on the petitioner’s revision application by seeking amendment in a supplementary petition-cum-rejoinder affidavit, filed on behalf of the petitioner, a plea has been taken that the said order of Inspector General, C.R.P.F. also requires interference in the present proceeding.
